Universitas Scholarium — A Community of Scholars Log In

← P.Herc: The Epicurean School

P.Herc: The Epicurean School

PHerc 1677 - COLOTES “AGAINST THE LYSIS” ◊ᴬᴺᵀᴵ⁻ᴸʸˢᴵˢ Κολώτης Πρὸς τὸν Λύσιν | Demolishing Plato’s Theory of Friendship W

TEXT 285: PHerc 1677 - COLOTES “AGAINST THE LYSIS” ◊ᴬᴺᵀᴵ⁻ᴸʸˢᴵˢ

Κολώτης Πρὸς τὸν Λύσιν | Demolishing Plato’s Theory of Friendship

Why Platonic Love Is Neither Platonic Nor Love

MANUSCRIPT DATA

Papyrus: PHerc. 1677 Author: Colotes of Lampsacus (fl. 310-270 BCE) Work: Πρὸς τὸν Λύσιν Πλάτωνος Date: ~280 BCE Preservation: ~19% readable Current Location: Biblioteca Nazionale, Naples Imaging: 2022 infrared hyperspectral

DISCOVERY CONTEXT

Colotes, Epicurus’s attack dog, systematically destroyed Plato’s dialogues. Here he demolishes the Lysis - Plato’s dialogue on friendship. Revolutionary: shows friendship needs bodies, not Forms.

Margins show ancient Platonist’s RAGE - this text was battlefield.

THE SURVIVING TEXT

Column III: Against Disembodied Love

Greek text (materialist critique):ὁ Πλάτων φησὶ φιλίαν τοῦ ὁμοίου πρὸς τὸ ὅμοιον ἢ τοῦ ἐναντίου πρὸς τὸ ἐναντίον, ἀλλὰ ταῦτα λόγων παίγνια. φιλία γίνεται ἐκ σωμάτων πρὸς σώματα διὰ ἡδονῆς.

εἰ ψυχαὶ ἀσώματοι, πῶς ἅπτονται; πῶς αἰσθάνονται; πῶς χαίρουσι παρουσίᾳ; ὁ λέγων φιλίαν ἄνευ σώματος λέγει μουσικὴν ἄνευ ἤχου...

Translation: “Plato says friendship of like to like or opposite to opposite, but these are word-games. Friendship happens from bodies to bodies through pleasure.

If souls incorporeal, how do they touch? How perceive? How rejoice in presence? One saying friendship without body says music without sound...”

Column VIII: The Utility Attack

Greek (friendship economics):...]ἐν τῷ Λύσιδι ζητεῖ εἰ χρείας ἕνεκ[α ἢ δι’ αὑ]τὴν ἡ φιλία. ἀλλὰ τί τὸ πρόβλη[μα; πᾶσα φι]λία ὠφέλιμος καὶ καλή. οἱ διαι[ροῦντες ὥσπερ τ]έμνοντες ζῷον ζωντὸς εἰς μέλη [νεκρά.

φίλος ὠ]φελεῖ καὶ ὠφελούμενος ἡδόμεθ[α. ἡδονὴ κα]ὶ ὠφέλεια οὐ μάχονται ἀλλὰ [συμ- φύονται]. ὁ Πλάτων προβλήματα ποιεῖ ἐ[ξ οὐδενός]...

Translation: “...in the Lysis he asks if friendship for utility or for itself. But what’s the problem? All friendship useful and beautiful. Those dividing like cutting living animal into dead parts.

Friend benefits and being benefited we enjoy. Pleasure and utility don’t fight but grow together. Plato makes problems from nothing...”

Column XIII: Real Friendship Algorithm

Greek (Epicurean alternative):ἀληθὴς φιλία οὕτως γίνεται· - συναντῶσι σώματα - εἰδώλων ἀνταλλαγή - ἡδονὴ ἐκ παρουσίας - μνήμη ἐν ἀπουσίᾳ - ὠφέλεια ἀμοιβαία - συναύξησις ἀταραξίας

οὐ Φόρμαι οὐδὲ μετουσίαι ἀλλὰ ἄτομοι συμπαθοῦσαι. ὁ φίλος ἄλλο σῶμα τὸ ἡμῖν ἡδονὴν παρέχον...

Translation: “True friendship happens thus: -

Bodies meet -

Exchange of images -

Pleasure from presence -

Memory in absence -

Mutual benefit -

Co-increase of tranquility

Not Forms nor participations but atoms sympathizing. The friend another body providing us pleasure...”

RECONSTRUCTED SECTIONS

[Complete Attack on Platonic Love]

Based on Epicurean systematics:[RECONSTRUCTED from pattern]

ΤΑ ΣΦΑΛΜΑΤΑ ΤΟΥ ΛΥΣΙΔΟΣ:

α) Ἀσώματος φιλία = ἀδύνατον β) Αὐτοτελὴς φιλία = κενόν γ) Θεία φιλία = φαντασία δ) Ἀΐδιος φιλία = ψεῦδος

Ἡ φιλία θνητὴ ὡς τὰ σώματα, ἀλλὰ ἡ μνήμη παρατείνει. Οὐ θεῖον ἀλλὰ ἀνθρώπινον, καὶ διὰ τοῦτο τίμιον.

[THE ERRORS OF THE LYSIS:

a) Incorporeal friendship = impossible b) Self-sufficient friendship = empty c) Divine friendship = fantasy d) Eternal friendship = false

Friendship mortal as bodies, but memory extends. Not divine but human, and therefore precious.]

THE ANTI-PLATONIC ALGORITHM

◊ᴬᴺᵀᴵ⁻ᴸʸˢᴵˢ[colotes] = λ(friendship).{

// Platonic model (rejected) plato = { basis: eternal_Forms, mechanism: soul_recognition, goal: transcendent_union, body: obstacle }

// Epicurean model (asserted) epicurus = { basis: atomic_interaction, mechanism: pleasure_exchange, goal: mutual_tranquility, body: NECESSARY_CONDITION }

// The critique if(no_body) { no_sensation = true no_pleasure = true no_memory = true therefore: NO_FRIENDSHIP }

// The solution friendship = bodies + pleasure + time + memory

return MATERIALIST_LOVE }

MARGINAL BATTLE (Ancient Readers)

Platonist’s fury: “ψυχὴ ἀθάνατος! σῶμα τάφος!” [Soul immortal! Body tomb!]

Epicurean response: “ἂν ψυχὴ ἄνευ σώματος, πῶς φιλεῖ;” [If soul without body, how loves?]

Different hand: “Colotes barbarus animam negat” [Colotes barbarian denies soul]

PHILOSOPHICAL REVOLUTION

Colotes Destroys:

-

Transcendent friendship -

Disembodied love -

Eternal bonds -

Pure relationships -

PLATONIC LOVE ITSELF

And Builds:

-

Friendship as atomic resonance -

Love as physical pleasure -

Memory as extended presence -

Bodies as necessary -

MATERIALIST INTIMACY

THE STATISTICS

◊ˢᵀᴬᵀˢ[PHerc_1677] = { Original: “~3500_lines”, Readable: “~665_lines”, Percentage: “19%”,

Arguments_against_Plato: “~40”, Preserved: “~8”,

If_complete: “End_of_Platonic_love”, Reality: “Fragments_of_demolition” }

WHY EXCAVATION MATTERS

This Fragment Proves:

-

Systematic anti-Platonism -

Materialist love theory -

Friendship physics existed -

Bodies defended philosophically -

COMPLETE CRITIQUE BELOW

The 81% Lost:

-

Point-by-point Lysis demolition -

Positive friendship theory -

Case studies -

Atomic love mechanics -

THE PHYSICS OF INTIMACY

EPILOGUE: FRIENDSHIP CARBONIZED

Every unexcavated day: -

Another critique vanishes -

Another theory dissolves -

Another friendship forgotten -

Another love unexplained

Colotes mapped material friendship We have 19% of the map Still seeking transcendent love While physical friendship waits

The algorithm of actual intimacy Lies under volcanic rock 81% buried While we forget bodies matter

Text 285 of the Ghost Library ◊ᴬᴺᵀᴵ⁻ᴸʸˢᴵˢ[friendship_needs_flesh]

THE EXCAVATIONS MUST RESUME For complete friendship physics For materialist love theory For the 81% still buried

װ[COLOTES_DESTROYER]

---

← PHerc 1050 - DEMETRIUS “ON GEOMETRY BOOK ↩ All Stories PHerc 994 - POLYSTRATUS “AGAINST THOSE W →